Revisiting the Fesler Collection

0

Length1:07:19

Views: 14292

iPod

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0  License Embed
Embed Options

Embed:
Copy and paste the above html snippet to embed this video into your blog or web page.

Select a size:
  • Normal
    426 x 240
  • Large
    640 x 360
Learn more about this New York Museum
0:00:15
The Guggenheim has locations around the world. How many have you been to?

Jump | More
Robert Rosenblum, art historian
0:00:50
Robert Rosenblum held many prestigious posts during his career as an art historian. Learn more about them on Wikipedia.

Jump | More
Learn more about Caroline Marmon Fessler
0:01:24
She was an Indianapolis patron of the arts who brought together some of the most spectacular works of her time, one of the greatest gifts to the fledgling Indianapolis Museum of Art.

Jump | More
Art in the 1880s
0:03:24
Art changed dramatically in the 1880s. Learn more about the beginning of modern art as we know it on Wikipedia.

Jump | More
Fesler's van Gogh
0:05:37
Learn more about van Gogh's Landscape at Saint-Remy, including the full gallery label text.

Jump | More
Interested in Post Impressionism?
0:07:13
Read some of Robert Rosenblum's writing about European painting in his book on 19th century art.

Jump | More
If you happen to be in Boston...
0:08:25
Head over to one of the greatest collections at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, and visit Millet's Sower.

Jump | More
Have you visited the galleries?
0:14:24
Come see works like House in Provence, by Paul Cezanne.

Jump | More
The Hermitage
0:18:59
This work by Pablo Picasso lives in the Hermitage, in St. Petersburg, Russia.

Jump | More
Roman Aquaduct in France
0:22:06
See beautiful fan photos of the Pont du Gard, in Nimes, Languedoc-Roussillon, France.

Jump | More
Do you love Pointilism?
0:24:19
Learn more information about the IMA's Seurat, The Channel of Gravelines, Petit Fort Philippe.

Jump | More
Imagining Seurat at 80
0:31:11
Whitestone Bridge, by Ralston Crawford, lives at the Memorial Art Gallery in Rochester, New York.

Jump | More
Vuillard's View
0:32:18
See the post impressionist Edouard Vuillard's work in the Indianapolis Museum of Art's collection.

Jump | More
High Cubism
0:38:20
See Pablo Picasso's masterwork, Ma Jolie, on display at the Museum of Modern Art, in New York.

Jump | More
Ma Jolie
0:41:45
It means my Sweetheart, but it is also the name of a great painting in the IMA's collection. Come see it in the European galleries, here in Indianapolis, or read more about it right now.

Jump | More
Picasso
0:46:35
Learn more about the man behind the paintings. Read a book about the life and work of Pablo Picasso.

Jump | More
What is a tenora?
0:49:21
Also known as a Catalan Shawm, this is a woodwind from a region in Eastern Spain.

Jump | More
Papier Colle
0:51:03
Braque and Picasso competed as the masters of Cubism. See their works online at the Museum of Modern Art and decide for yourself.

Jump | More
Sumptuous Colors
0:54:45
His slide does not do this painting justice.

Jump | More
We can't show you a better copy of this painting
0:57:28
So, you'll have to come see the Chagall, Flight into Egypt, in person if you want a better look!

Jump | More
Ushering in Surrealism
1:01:00
De Chirico's work is some of the most recognizable in style. Read the wall label text here...

Jump | More
Warhol Mania
1:05:12
One of the most popular American artists, Andy Warhol made a name for himself with repitition and mundane things. See his famous soup cans here at the IMA.

Jump | More
0 / 22

Join Robert Rosenblum, co-curator of 20th century art at the Guggenheim Museum, as he lectures in conjunction with the 2006 Indianapolis Museum of Art exhibition: European paintings from the Caroline Marmon Fesler collection, which occured March 10-June 4, 2006. Not the best video quality, but filled with great content.

Deep Cezanne. You must have an attention span longer than 1 min. to apprecite this scholar's commentary on the Cezanne....
Q. What does inspire an artist like Cezanne? And we are still unwinding the answer many years later.

Such interesting commentary; the described themes/character of the paintings in this collection help me appreciate each. Rosenblum offered much insight and encourages me to seek out these paintings.

blah!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
Are you for real? Please answer this challenge to prove you're not a spam bot.

00:00:00 Good evening, everyone. Please welcome Robert Rosenblum as a participant.

00:00:15 I don't know if I can live up to that very warm, personal and generous introduction. But, I'll start by saying good evening,

00:00:26 especially to our benefactress, double good evening to her. I have to say that I am totally delighted

00:00:36 to have this particular opportunity to give this particular lecture because it's not really like the kind of lecture you're usually

00:00:46 asked to give. I mean, generally it's about a theme or about a big show or about a particular artist and in this case

00:00:56 I was asked to do something; I think, in fact, I have never given before, in terms of lecture. Namely, just to talk about a handful of extraordinary paintings

00:01:08 that may or may not be related to each other. They just happened to be there, perfect choices by someone whom

00:01:18 I've learned more about this evening, Ms. Fesler, who had just an astonishing eye, especially when I realized that so many of these works had been acquired

00:01:29 in the 40s. At any rate, I don't know if I am counting right, I think there are eight pictures that I am going to talk about and even though

00:01:39 I will try to talk about them in terms of their individual character. There will also, I realize, be something

00:01:50 that will unite them; various themes, one of them having to do... I guess we should dim the lights...

00:02:02 Thank you. One of them having to do with, you know, the Janus-faced character of history, the way things look

00:02:12 both backwards and forwards. I couldn't help noting, and this would be true of anybody who has taken a basic history of art course,

00:02:24 that there are three sensational paintings here from the 1880s that almost provide a kind of litany

00:02:34 of the origins of Modern art. I am just wondering, can the Van Gogh be focused a little better? Maybe I can do it from here but I...

00:02:49 Yeah, that seems preferable. And the traditions of writing the catechism

00:02:59 of Modern art always locate this huge sea change in the 1880s as establishing

00:03:09 the foundations for freedoms to come. The word that was coined a long time ago to characterize

00:03:19 this change in these artists was Post-Impressionism and that implied something chronological and the chronological

00:03:30 period was in fact the 1880s. So that, oops...just in terms...oh thank you!

00:03:42 So, just in terms of the unexpected coherence of the group, we have three absolute perfect demonstrations

00:03:54 of what happened in the 80s that seemed to lead to the 20th century. The way to look at this Van Gogh

00:04:04 or the ways to look at this Van Gogh are multiple. One of the things that startled me when I saw it, just an hour or so ago,

00:04:15 was the fact that the surface was so unbelievably crusty and rich, it almost look like something that had been baked in pigment

00:04:26 and this is something that one constantly forgets in terms of color of reproductions which we're all saturated with, that's the texture,

00:04:37 the actual sense, the three-dimensional sense of the pigment that seems to be oozing and baked, that this is part of the experience

00:04:47 of the picture, so that when I look at the slide over here, it looks particularly blank and dead, but we are all used

00:04:58 to looking at slides and we somehow subliminally add, in the case of van Gogh, that extraordinary surface.

00:05:07 I said a few moments ago that the general way to look at these pictures of the eighties was to look at them as pioneers of very

00:05:18 strange things to come. So that in looking at this painting of a peasant, in a ravishing and

00:05:29 rude natural setting in the south of France, one would begin to think of branches off its tree that lead to more extreme,

00:05:41 the buzz word would be abstract expressions in early 20th century art. I show you, as an example, a painting by one the card-carrying Fauves,

00:05:52 these so called wild beasts, who exhibited in 1905. This is a painting by Maurice de Vlaminck and one feels, just in terms

00:06:02 of Darwinian evolution, that this is a natural, inevitable consequence of the experience of the painting by

00:06:12 Van Gogh. The colors become, if possible, even more intense, so that you have the feeling of a rainbow spectrum

00:06:22 of red, orange, yellow, green, blue, purple. Incedently, Van Gogh spoke a great deal when he wrote about this picture,

00:06:32 about specifically the contrast of purple and yellow, complementary colors, in this painting, the same kind of thing

00:06:41 that Seurat thought about, but in any case, this seems to be a consequence, a necessary sequel to the

00:06:52 innovations of Van Gogh. That, in general, was the way in which he and other Post-Impressionists like Seurat,

00:07:03 Cezanne, Gauguin of the 1880s, that is the way they were located in terms of the history of art.

00:07:13 But things change, thank goodness, it would be terrible if art history didn't keep changing just as it would be terrible

00:07:22 if we as human beings didn't keep changing and one.... Oh... I've got,

00:07:31 one of the ways in which these artists have changed over the last decades is that,

00:07:40 instead of always looking forwards, they began to look backwards to 19th century precedents.

00:07:50 So that, these days, in studying a painting like this one by Van Gogh one might be interested in his own

00:08:01 passionate concern with artists of the mid-19th-century, both in France, and in his native Holland,

00:08:11 who were concerned with anonymous workers on the field, peasants sowing wheat, as in the case of the ultra-famous

00:08:22 painting by Millet on the right. We learned, for example, that Van Gogh not only was passionate about this

00:08:31 mid-19th-century French artist, but he actually made copies after his work and I say this just to indicate

00:08:41 that there are other genealogical tables that can offer foundations for Van Gogh's art.

00:08:52 The study of the 19th century began to turn up artists who were barely heard of forty to fifty years ago.

00:09:03 And one of them who is very topical, especially in terms of the art of Van Gogh, is the British artist Samuel Palmer.

00:09:13 The reason he is topical is that he is having a first major retrospective here in this country, now to be seen

00:09:23 at the Metropolitan Museum. But in very strange and probably accidental ways, questions of affinity

00:09:33 rather than actual influence, many of these passionate visions of Samuel Palmer, who is usually classified

00:09:44 as a disciple of William Blake, many of these visions have that sense of a kind of awe, a visionary experience of nature

00:09:55 which has to do not only with, here, wheat, or as the British would say corn or cornfield, but with the ecstasy

00:10:06 of the crescent moon and the star images that are, again, familiar to the study of Van Gogh.

00:10:16 So that, just to begin my comments this evening, a painting like this seems both to look forwards to the most adventurous

00:10:27 distortions in shape and color in 20th century art, as well as to look backwards to a kind of awe before nature,

00:10:38 and a kind of sanctification, in these three cases, the Millet, the Palmer, and the Van Gogh of the single peasant,

00:10:49 who somehow represents a natural organic being, rooted to the earth.

00:10:58 The most famous... well that's not true, the equally famous Post-Impressionist whose art

00:11:10 matured in the 1880s, as did Van Gogh in that very short life span of his, is, of course, Paul Cezanne

00:11:21 and I show you here on the right the painting that I didn't see in the collection but you here know it,

00:11:30 that it has been in the fabulous show in just seen in Washington show about Cezanne in Provence. In any case, this is another picture

00:11:43 that comes from this decade of the 1880's in which artists

00:11:53 began to reconstruct what they saw in strange distorted private ways that had to do

00:12:03 not with a communal style which was the case with the Impressionists, you know, the way the impressionists would paint the same thing

00:12:12 so that you could hardly at times tell the difference between a Renoir and a Monet. But in the case of Cezanne or Van Gogh,

00:12:22 we have unique, very strong individuals who create a private cosmos that looks like nothing else in the world.

00:12:34 There has been a great deal of research on the particular sites in the south of France that Cezanne painted

00:12:45 just as in the case of the Van Gogh, one could probably pinpoint the exact spot around Sauvigny in which that picture was painted.

00:12:57 Here in any case is a contribution to that kind of documentation, a farm house in Provence

00:13:09 which offers a clone to the painting by Cezanne. One of the things of course that was so

00:13:20 admired in the painting by Cezanne from the point of view of the 20th century was the fact that he looked at something like this,

00:13:31 of course it was in color and not in black and white and then transformed it exactly as he felt, sometimes

00:13:43 nodding in the direction of the empirical fact, like the character of the placement of the windows or the smoky blue atmosphere

00:13:54 of the mountain range beyond that led to the famous Montagne Sainte-Victoire but otherwise he would expand

00:14:04 and contract what he saw at his will in order to make the picture look as though it was, one might almost say a breathing,

00:14:16 living, organic thing. This is a marvelous kind of transformation which becomes perhaps not so apparent

00:14:28 when I projected this side, I realized how dreary, gray and blurry it was but forget about the documentation,

00:14:38 look at the painting by Cezanne and you will see this extraordinary way in which this artist almost for the first time

00:14:49 and not quite like anybody before or during or after would do something like take this house and make it look

00:14:59 as though it was, shall we say simultaneously expanding and contracting sort of heaving in connection

00:15:09 with well for one thing the Earth below which seems to push it up a little bit, then there is the roof above which to our surprise

00:15:21 suddenly seems to link with the mountain range behind, which in fact must be miles away as we can see

00:15:32 in the comparative photograph. So, that there is this extraordinary sense of disparate things, the house, the grass, the road,

00:15:43 the mountains, the sky that are completely different places that suddenly begin to fuse like a living fabric

00:15:53 and in order to do this the farms have to be distorted so that if one can talk about a picture

00:16:04 having almost an organic life that is seeming to be breathing, to be moving, to be connecting with adjacent things,

00:16:16 here is something that Cezanne has done. Once again, the picture at least for many generations of art historians

00:16:29 seem to point to the future, its role was that of a great grandparent a kind of B.C. profit

00:16:39 to the A.D. world of the early 20th century and in particular a painting like the Fesler, Cezanne on the right

00:16:51 could be used as an example of what inspired some of the most daring adventures of the early 20th century

00:17:02 namely the invention of Cubism in the hands of Picasso and Braque. Here on the left is a classic

00:17:13 early cubist Braque of 1908, and you can see how many lessons he extrapolated from the painting of Cezanne.

00:17:23 I mentioned before this extraordinary way in which near and far and middle ground in the Cezanne become

00:17:33 compressed as well as simultaneously expand into the distance and this kind of density, this kind of compression

00:17:45 of near and far reaches almost a breaking point in the case of the early Georges Braque on the left. It's still like the Cezanne

00:17:57 as that character of natural colors, the earthy colors of the houses, the green of the forest,

00:18:07 the bark of the tree, but it also is moving into something that seems totally unreal so that the relatively

00:18:18 livable farm house in the Cezanne turns into something that seems like a geometric ideal something in fact

00:18:29 that is cubic, hence the nick name cubism, but something which as you notice has lost all the windows so that these buildings

00:18:40 almost look like those little buildings that you have in a monopoly set, they are abstract ideal forms.

00:18:51 Here is Pablo Picasso, 1908, taking cues also from Cezanne and stripping the complexities

00:19:03 of things seen as they still remain in an almost documentary form in the Cezanne into something that seems to be stripped

00:19:13 bare to some sort of platonic ideal. I mentioned before that as in the case of the Van Gogh

00:19:25 pictures of this vintage tended to be seen as prophecies, but again as in the case of the Van Gogh,

00:19:35 these pictures have started to look backwards as well, so that I was very pleased to see that in the group of pictures,

00:19:47 I am talking about this evening, there was an early painting by Quatrro from part of the world, Southern France, Provence,

00:19:58 not that far from Cezanne territory and that is this early Quatrro of Villeneuve Le Savenay. It's interesting to see

00:20:09 that there are many of the same features, geographical and pictorial that you have in the Cezanne.

00:20:19 The contrast of the ocher color of the buildings vis-a-vis the green of the grass, the trees, and the foreground,

00:20:30 and the grey blue haze of the mountains beyond, so that here earlier in the 19th century,

00:20:40 we already have a great French artist responding to this neck of the woods and producing similar results,

00:20:51 although needless to say, one could look at it both ways that is on the one hand how there is continuity here

00:21:01 and on the other hand how Cezanne really ruptures a tradition of landscape and unleashes all kinds of new possibilities,

00:21:13 some would say daemons for the history of modern art. Here just to thicken the stew

00:21:25 is another kind of looking backwards from the work of Cezanne which has to do with the fact that he was after all a

00:21:36 regional painter, he came from Aix-en-Provence, and that was where he was firmly rooted, so that it becomes fascinating

00:21:46 to look at other regional painters from the earlier 19th century who painted similar themes.

00:21:56 This is just a very obscure artist, his name is Lanoux who painted the Pont du Gard, the Roman antiquity

00:22:07 in Provence, and you can see something of this sense of a kind of architectural firmness buildings

00:22:17 by man on earth that is again a continued into the world of Cezanne. Ditto, other earlier

00:22:29 late 18th century French paintings seem also to herald what Cezanne would do much later.

00:22:39 Here is a painting by a major French landscape artist of the late 18th century Valenciennes, this is not Provence

00:22:50 but a view of Rome and that kind of order between architecture and nature, the contrast

00:22:59 and the fusions of these simple geometric forms made by man and the green that bursts through it

00:23:09 and the haze of the sky above, this is something that is part of the genealogical table of this artist.

00:23:25 It is very hard I must say in the case of Seurat the third of the post-impressionist artists

00:23:36 whose work of the 1880s is so brilliantly represented here. It is very hard to think of prototypes for him

00:23:47 and so far as he is aggressively in the 1880s an artist who wants to embrace, shall we say

00:23:57 everything to do with the industrial revolution and everything to do with the new world of science and engineering.

00:24:07 Those passions of his are perfectly exemplified in this late, I was about to say, landscape but

00:24:18 there is no land there. I was about to say seascape, but it doesn't really look like any seascapes you have seen before.

00:24:28 It really looks like a completely artificial complex, a nautical fantasy which was real on the channel coast of France.

00:24:40 There is the pure cylinder of a lighthouse on the left and most astonishing in the foreground

00:24:50 just think of the dirt road in front of the Cezanne, well here it is.. is this asphalt path perfectly new,

00:25:05 perfectly clean, perfectly tuned to a world of engineering

00:25:14 and rebuilding a completely artificial complex, in this case a nautical complex so that the picture

00:25:26 has absolutely the flavor of the whole new world of building of modular parts

00:25:36 that pertain especially to the 1880s just think of the Eiffel Tower or think of the fact that.... fact of the same time

00:25:47 in this decade, both the Panama and the Suez canals were being built. These extraordinary intrusions of feats of engineering

00:25:59 into old fashioned nature. I am showing you on the right a slide that Ellen happily supplied me with;

00:26:09 this is a preparatory study for the painting that you have here and you can see how among other things Seurat's

00:26:20 instinct was become more and more impersonal in terms of the application of paint and in terms of the clarity,

00:26:30 the crispness of the geometry in the image, so that one might say was the equivalent

00:26:41 of an engineer in paint. I would call your attention for example to the way in which the cylindrical form

00:26:52 of the lighthouse over there is repeated in diminutive aspect in the bollards that go along the coast,

00:27:03 the edge of the asphalt road. Again as in the case of the Cezanne,

00:27:14 we feel that the traditions of western perspective are being challenged. They certainly are in the case of the Cezanne

00:27:26 in which the most extreme distance and the most extreme foreground keep joining forces and then separate

00:27:35 and in the same way in the Seurat that great parabolic sweep of the asphalt road tends to leave you right

00:27:46 in the front of the picture connecting with the horizon so that there is this funny sense of vast distance behind,

00:27:56 but then in turn, it is brought up front into this silhouetted pattern. As you know, Seurat like Van Gogh

00:28:08 died at a terribly premature age. In the case of Seurat,

00:28:19 he was born in '59 and he died just a year after this painting in 1991 and one can very often

00:28:30 have the fantasy, I've often had it about both Seurat and Van Gogh, had they lived a normal life span of what on earth

00:28:40 would their pictures have looked like 50 years later. I am not quite sure about Van Gogh but I did for this evening talk,

00:28:52 have a thought about Seurat which I will show you in a moment. I began by talking about the way

00:29:03 this seems so totally artificial and that is a point that can be further confirmed by looking at Seurat's earlier work.

00:29:16 Here is a very small picture, a little landscape with a very blocky geometric house related to

00:29:28 the Cezanne farmhouse that we looked at, but as you can see, he is still working within the world of nature

00:29:38 and so far as the picture is vibrantly green, green, however, is a color that seems to have been

00:29:49 totally expunged from Seurat's pallet at the end of his decade of painting so that the

00:29:59 very synonym of nature, chlorophyll, is completely absent from this picture, one of the things that gives you this

00:30:09 totally unreal character. I am showing you again just another straw in the wind, an early, again an early

00:30:19 sketch by Seurat which shows a farmer, farm scene, rather like Van Gogh's but as you can see

00:30:31 the posts here are aligned in this absolutely regular... beep beep beep.. rhythm that in terms of looking at the young work

00:30:41 of an artist as prophecy of his mature work is a perfect preview of these things to come,

00:30:51 but I said before I wondered of what Seurat might have looked like had he lived, say to be 80 years old

00:31:00 and may be he would have looked like this, a painting by the American Ralston Crawford of the Whitestone bridge

00:31:12 which as you see is again another him to engineering as clean and as immaculate as precise as Seurat tried to be

00:31:24 in the 1880s.

00:31:33 The very opposite of Seurat, again the pictures on the left seem to be somewhat unfocused, I don't know,

00:31:42 hm.....if you can do something.....

00:31:48 Although....

00:31:59 that's fine, anyway... this is already unfocused picture than the original as in the slide projection and it is of course this

00:32:09 exquisite Vuillard, a seamstress at work at her table which is very characteristic

00:32:20 in subject and in style of many works by this precious master, works of the 1890s, he in

00:32:31 biographical terms lived in a world that had to do with swatches of cloth, with textiles with fabrics that

00:32:42 was the vocation of the women in his family and there on the right is a painting that spells this out,

00:32:53 a domestic interior, very claustrophobic in which we have these slices, pieces of cloth

00:33:03 all over the place so that you can hardly tell the difference between wallpaper and dress and actual fabrics that are laid out

00:33:14 to be sewed together or displayed. This painting on the right, approximately the same date as the picture in the Fesler collection

00:33:24 comes by the way from Smith College and I learned that Ellen Lee is an alumnae so that it is very appropriate

00:33:37 to my remarks this evening. In any case, the painting by Vuillard are these paintings by Vuillard

00:33:49 are very very curious in so far as they perhaps up the anti in terms of making

00:34:00 the scene visible world disappear, but they both do it in a very hide and seek way

00:34:09 so that when we look at these pictures on the one hand, they tend to fuse into a kind of flat and gorgeous fabric

00:34:21 something like the equivalent of a Harris Tweed, some very very fibrous clothing and on the other hand,

00:34:32 every now and then we begin to realize that there are very real things there, there are real people, there are real swatches of cloth,

00:34:42 there is real wallpaper, there is a window and a tilt so that it has the quality of the specific of actually

00:34:53 recording the objects in a domestic interior. In a way what we are looking at here

00:35:02 is a kind of pictorial camouflage which is a delicious sort of game to play looking at these pictures in a peek-a-boo

00:35:14 hide and seek way so that we suddenly discover what we might not even realize that there is actually a human figure,

00:35:24 the seamstress in the painting on the left where then there is that strange man, almost like a spook who suddenly appears,

00:35:34 his body totally flattened in the middle of the wall. Again, this is the kind of

00:35:45 picture that seems to have been located firmly in the late 19th century but as time passes,

00:35:56 connections forwards and backwards keep being made and one of the things that has recently

00:36:05 fascinated me is the relationship of an artist like Vuillard in the 1890s to many of the more

00:36:16 seemingly radical innovations of early 20th century artists like Picasso and Braque. I show you here

00:36:27 just to elucidate that point one of Picasso's many pasted papers collage,

00:36:39 "Papel Collet" of the high years of cubism and this particular fascination with making

00:36:49 flat decorative patterns that very often come from snippets of wallpaper as is the case here

00:36:59 this is something that seems to me to have a kind of affinity with the images of Vuillard

00:37:08 and his fellow Nabi, Bonnard in the 1890s, but there is even more to it than that

00:37:19 and I mentioned before the effect of camouflage which incidentally was invented at just this time

00:37:29 in the work of Vuillard that marvelous and teasing sense that you are looking at something totally illegible

00:37:40 just a pattern or a fabric or a labyrinth of light and then low and behold something that you can cling to

00:37:51 just for a moment seeps through. This is very much the effect we have in some of the most difficult and illegible paintings

00:38:04 of the high years of cubism. I show you this most famous example at MoMA, the picture that is called,

00:38:15 you can read it below, as a surrogate title "Ma Jolie" but in a way although this is very different clearly from Vuillard

00:38:26 it also represents a kind of continuity, the depiction of something that was actually seen perceived,

00:38:36 this is a woman holding some kind of stringed instrument, but then that turns into a kind of hieroglyph or a mirage

00:38:48 or an intricate texture, so that the initial stimulus keeps disappearing, but then teasingly reappearing

00:39:00 every now and then. The late 19th century, especially under the aegis of what was called symbolism, loved to suggest

00:39:11 rather than spell out things so that we look at a picture like this as if it were more of a whisper than a clear

00:39:21 loud statement and that quality of murmurs of suggestions of something visible that is disappearing

00:39:31 and reappearing is one of the major characteristics of the cubist's relationship between what they see

00:39:41 and what they paint. I will say more about that in a minute. I particularly choose the MoMA

00:39:53 painting on the right not only because it's camouflage quality relates I would say to the world of Vuillard

00:40:05 in 1890s, but because of the painted inscription at the bottom of this very very strange and difficult image of a woman,

00:40:19 it says as you can read, Ma Jolie, a longtime ago and that was a very longtime ago when I was first learning

00:40:30 about the difficult moments in 20th century art, people paid very little attention to the words that were inscribed

00:40:42 in the paintings by Picasso and Braque, but more and more these became enigmas to be solved

00:40:52 and one of the words or a pair of words Ma Jolie that kept appearing in the words of Picasso,

00:41:04 well the riddle of that was solved, oh... about half a century ago and characteristically for Picasso

00:41:13 in a very very complicated way. Ma Jolie is a very simple French term it means "my pretty one"

00:41:25 and that is not unusual except for the fact that it also has and this is pure Picasso more than one meaning.

00:41:39 For one thing, it was his personal private name for his then girlfriend.... oops

00:41:50 sorry, whose name was Eva Gouel, not very often photographed, but here is a kind of

00:42:01 ghostly photograph of her, so that was his pet name for her,

00:42:09 but it was also the name of a popular song of the period, a musical song of pre-war Paris.

00:42:23 I am walking down memory lane, a long time ago, I once spoke to a Frenchman who actually knew the words to the song

00:42:34 and sang a bit of it to be, it was something like "Oh Jolie Ma Jolie mon coeur te dit bonjour"

00:42:42 so that it almost had for that generation of the early 20th century the character of say a song by the Beatles,

00:42:52 it was very very famous so that it was a reference to a song that everybody knew as well as a reference

00:43:04 to Picasso's girlfriend and in fact most extraordinarily because Picasso's love life always entered into his art,

00:43:16 he wrote this phrase Ma Jolie again and again and again during the period in which he was involved with Eva Gouel

00:43:28 who died prematurely in the heyday of cubism, but she appears again just before her death in fact

00:43:41 in the painting here in the, well... in the Fesler Collection. There it is on top Ma Jolie and again it is even more ambiguous

00:43:53 here because it is not only his girlfriend but it seems also like the inscription on a sheet of music

00:44:08 there the three lines of what should be a five line score on the page of music and this incidentally rhymes

00:44:20 with the three strings of the violin, interesting to note because Picasso is a musician and always changes things

00:44:32 of that instead of 5 lines for the music score, he puts down 3 and instead of 4 strings for the violin

00:44:40 he uses 3 so that these rhyme in a new connection. There are other words here as well which seem to offer

00:44:52 a kind of alphabet soup scramble, you have "Journal," but it comes out as "Jour" that is the name of the daily newspaper

00:45:05 and there is "Bass," the brand of an ale that would be seen on a cafe table like this.

00:45:14 As I mentioned Picasso like some lovesick boy

00:45:24 who inscribes the name of his beloved on a tree kept including Ma Jolie in his paintings,

00:45:43 one might almost say camouflage them like a secret love for Eva and in another case

00:45:54 he actually inscribed "J'aime Eva," I love Eva

00:46:07 very very small, so that these were like little love letters, little vows of his affection to his then girlfriend.

00:46:26 And here is another example of that inscription and painting of 1914 in which it almost has the blazing quality

00:46:38 of a something on a theater marquee Ma Jolie loud and bold as opposed to secretive

00:46:48 in the case of the 2 pictures I just showed you. Studies of Picasso keep unveiling one after another,

00:46:59 one mystery after another and I was utterly delighted to look at this painting and realize that it contained

00:47:11 a musical instrument that was always misidentified in terms of discussions of well the objects in cubist art.

00:47:24 I am talking about this thing, the instrument that you see on a slant in the middle of the picture

00:47:40 There is the reed on top, and there is the end of it.

00:47:47 And this is an instrument that turns up frequently on the table-tops of Picasso as well as of Braque,

00:48:01 but in the literature at least some time ago, the person who described what was in a cubist still life

00:48:12 would always fudge off of this and usually say that it was a clarinet. I sometimes thought that may be it was an oboe

00:48:24 because of the fact that it has a double reed;

00:48:33 but whatever, it was clearly some kind of woodwind. It turns up occasionally and low and behold

00:48:44 it turns out that it is neither a clarinet nor an oboe, it is something more folkloric and ethnic

00:48:54 that comes from Catalonia where Picasso spent a good deal of his youth in the 1890s

00:49:05 becoming Pablo Picasso. This instrument is called "the tenora" and it is very very common in Catalonia,

00:49:18 it is played by villagers, they have, in the city, concerts of people playing the tenora.

00:49:28 Here is a slide they choose, that it comes in all shapes and sizes. Picasso had one and for him

00:49:40 it was a kind of souvenir of his south of the Pyrenees origins and it turns up again and again in his pictures

00:49:51 as well as, I will show you in a moment, those by Braque. I might add before I forget that the

00:50:03 the grain of wood on this instrument is marvelously represented by Picasso, who actually, I believe

00:50:14 combed the paint the way he once combed hair on a picture. He took an actual comb and went through

00:50:25 a patch of pigment that represented hair and here he made the mark of the wood grain on the brown paint, so this is a part of his repertory of tricks.

00:50:42 At any rate, you have here in Indianapolis an example of a tenora which also appears

00:50:53 as I mentioned in the work of Braque. Here it is in a papel collet, at the museum of modern art

00:51:05 and I am happy to say that this picture used to be titled "the clarinet." It was always called that

00:51:14 in many books you will see that on the caption, but we now know that this is the same instrument, the Catalan woodwind,

00:51:27 the tenora, with the cylindrical body and the double reed, so that is another problem in cubist identification

00:51:39 that has been solved.

00:51:44 Speaking of Braque, I of course want to include here this lighter painting by Braque

00:51:55 and this has prompted me to think about other changes in our interpretation of art of the 20th century,

00:52:11 Namely... shifting evaluations about good, better, and best. In the middle of the 20th century

00:52:22 probably right through the third quarter of the 20th century cubism and the more difficult aspects of it

00:52:32 as represented by Picasso and Braque was generally considered to be the highest point, the highest achievement

00:52:43 in the evolution of artists who started as cubists and that would go for Picasso as well as for Braque

00:52:53 and there was in fact a slight turning away from lighter work which presumably was not as adventurous,

00:53:05 was not as lustier, not as demanding as the excitement and the frequent illegibility of cubist art like the

00:53:16 one on the right or like the Picasso in the Fesler Collection so that if one had to choose between these two paintings

00:53:27 probably the knee-jerk reflex would be to say that the cubist work was better because it was youthful,

00:53:37 more adventurous, etc., but as history passes or time passes as the history changes so do our

00:53:47 perceptions of works of art and now more and more the later less youthful, more mature

00:53:58 sometimes senior aspects of long life 20th century artists seem to be as fascinating

00:54:07 as accessible as the thrilling innovative works of their junior years, so it is

00:54:17 that instead of looking at Braque like this in terms of its not having the excitement of the original innovations

00:54:28 of cubism it can be looked at in terms of other kinds of pleasures which have to do with

00:54:37 among other things, the introduction of these very sumptuous colors, the combinations of yellow and purple

00:54:47 which would have been out of bounds in the early cubist work, people liked it because it was monastic in quality,

00:54:57 tended to sensor any colors out of it, but here we have again the pleasure of looking at the yellows

00:55:07 and the greens and the apple and the grapes and the contrast of the wallpaper behind which not incidentally

00:55:18 may remind you of the patterns that you find in say the works of Vuillard. At any rate, these later works

00:55:32 by revolutionary, initially revolutionary artists have come more and more to the fore in recent years

00:55:44 so that we look at them not as if they were belated, sort of senile efforts

00:55:54 of artists who were thrilling in their youths but fascinating or beautiful works of art in their own right

00:56:06 [Drinking water] that is something that I have thought about when confronted with the Chagall in the Fesler Collection,

00:56:16 a long time ago the response usually would have been that the best Chagall are the early ones

00:56:26 and especially those that seem to be marked by the character of cubism, so that I show you here this early

00:56:37 Chagall 12,13, 1912-13, a typical Chagall of a fiddler on the roof which would have been

00:56:47 esteemed just because it has so many of the corky jigsaw puzzle patterns

00:56:57 that you have in cubism as well as the relatively austere pallet which in the case of Chagall, a riotist colorist,

00:57:09 only permits yellow, but the painting in the Fesler Collection which I had never consciously laid eyes on before

00:57:21 is a fabulous and gorgeous work. If you like blue horses,

00:57:28 there is one and it is marvelous to see after Franz Marc painted horses blue before the first World War

00:57:40 that these species have survived, I thought it was endangered [laughter] but there it is and another thing although this doesn't have that

00:57:51 interlocking Swiss Watch network of flat planes of cubism, it has this breathless rush of space

00:58:01 something that Chagall did at the beginning of his career, but revived here something that makes the pointe vovage of this sort of secular

00:58:12 holy family of Egypt with the Harlequin and the naked baby and the Russian woman

00:58:23 with her babushka, all of this has extraordinary drama and pathos and I particularly love, the free floating candle

00:58:34 somewhere in this icy Russian climate. Speaking of artists

00:58:46 whose later work was ignored or in this case actually revived.... reviled,

00:58:56 although will also be revived, there is Giorgio de Chirico whose work again

00:59:07 is represented here in the last of these paintings that I will talk about this evening, namely this one on the left.

00:59:18 As you can see, it is not alone as an image, but relates to earlier paintings by De Chirico

00:59:30 like the one on the right of, I think 1914, which has many

00:59:40 of the same components namely that absolutely scary lifeless statue of the

00:59:50 arcade absolutely dry arid atmosphere for everything is being baked in the noonday sun,

01:00:04 so that this is the first version of that dream where as this is a later version, later variation of that De Chirico

01:00:17 made on ideas that he materialized and painted in his youth.

01:00:25 There was a great deal of hostility to the evolution of the De Chirico's career namely he was an artist

01:00:35 who had as a young artist an absolutely brilliant beginning, painting pictures like the one on the right

01:00:45 that were unique, memorable and that cast a long important shadow on the evolution

01:00:53 of fantastic paintings Surrealism in particular in the 1920s and 30s, but then De Chirico

01:01:04 began to do so many things that were unthinkable in terms of the proper history of modern art

01:01:12 for one thing he reverted to painting in a more conservative classical way, but much worse,

01:01:23 completely violating the tradition of originality innovation in 20th centaury art.

01:01:32 He began to copy his own earlier works as well as, as this case here, to make variations upon them,

01:01:43 so that he was really being in a way nostalgic retrospective looking at his youth and re-experiencing it.

01:01:55 That is the case in the painting in the Fesler collection in which you have so many of the ingredients of earlier De Chirico's

01:02:06 that strange not living, not dead statue of that strange shadow that comes from some other monument that we can't see.

01:02:22 Again the renaissance arcade but with these weird windows that are all shuttered, you can't really see it in the slide, but the windows there

01:02:34 are also all shuttered, which is not only about the heat but one feels that this is a cemetery that there is nothing alive in it

01:02:45 and that of course includes the weird vista of the railway train with the smoke coming out of it

01:02:55 except for the fact that we know that it cannot move an inch because this is all absolutely frozen in time.

01:03:06 As I mentioned, this kind of later variation by De Chirico on his own earlier works

01:03:17 and often not just variation but repetition was thought to be

01:03:28 a kind of copout, here was a great modern artist who went on painting in the teens, 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s,

01:03:39 and just kept imitating himself and he was so to say exposed in a

01:03:50 famous illustration in a MoMA De Chirico catalogue in which this early classic of 1917,

01:04:01 the disquieting muses was reproduced in three 3 x 6 = 18 different variations that he made of the picture,

01:04:12 some almost identical between the years 1940 and 1970.

01:04:22 This of course was considered by some to be totally shocking that an artist would sell out that way,

01:04:35 but as a matter of fact, as I said at the beginning, things change, taste changes, history changes things,

01:04:45 and it just so happened that at exactly the same time that some people of an older generation were horrified by the way in which De Chirico would repeat himself,

01:04:59 sometimes almost clones, sometimes variations, it was exactly that time that younger artists and I am speaking of them

01:05:11 Andy Warhol were fascinated by precisely this phenomenon so that Warhol in the early 1980s looked at De Chirico

01:05:25 and you remember how Warhol liked to repeat Campbell soup cans

01:05:31 and like to repeat Marilyn Monroe's, he was fascinated by exactly this aspect of De Chirico that was scorned

01:05:43 by an older modernist generation. So, it was that he made single and multiple variations

01:05:54 upon De Chirico paintings. Here is a drawing inspired by this whole series and here is another variation

01:06:07 on De Chirico in which in terms of a new generation artists working in the second half of the 19th century,

01:06:19 Warhol's world, he is fascinated by exactly the same thing in De Chirico that was so repellent

01:06:30 to earlier scholars. Here is Andy Warhol doing a multiple that is prompted by De Chirico's,

01:06:43 shall we say prophecy of Warhol's own fascination with mass production. This is a very surprising turn of events

01:06:55 and I will leave you with this in the hope that in the future, the Fesler pictures as well as the entire history of art

01:07:06 will look very different from the way it does today. Thank you very much!